Monday, August 29, 2011

Committees for 2011-12

Public Relations- This group would be responsible for keeping other teachers and constituents in the district abreast of what is happening, writing articles for the newspaper or creating radio spots about what is planned for the building, updating folks about progress being made and developing a sense of excitement about the building, developing a plan for selecting a name for the facility.  This group could also be involved in maintaining a blog or website about the 5-6 center and the 7-8 building.  There probably needs to be members from all four grade levels on this committee.  It will be necessary and important for us to include interested parents and community leaders who can provide valuable insight into what those outside the walls of the public school are thinking about the changes going on in the district. 
Sub-Committee of PR: Orientation- There will be much excitement regarding the new building, both the 5th and 6th graders entering will be “NEW” to the building and it will necessitate we plan tours for these kids and opportunities for them to see the building and have parents involved.  Also, community members will want a chance to “get-inside” and take a look as well.  This task won’t be in place until much later but I wanted to include it as careful planning and preparation could make this a wonderful PR opportunity for the district.  I suggest this group be formed after the first of the year or in late February.
Instruction- Perhaps the largest task of all will be the development of a “plan” for instruction.  We’ll need to include “specialist” such as reading, music, art, physical ed., etc… on this committee with the end product being a schedule that will allow us to provide the instruction we want for our kids and the content that we wish to provide at all four grade levels.  This may include some curriculum writing time, visitations to other schools deemed to be progressive, working with levels both above the eighth grade and below the fifth to provide clear articulation of content.  Assessment of testing data may lead much of our discussion and as we massage and integrate Limelight into our daily activities there may be even more information available that will help us with our “plan.” 
Steering Committee- This committee will be made up of at least one member from all of the other committees and will include any interested School Board Members and of course Central office Members.  It will be important to “keep the various groups together” and the steering committee will serve that function.  This group will also create or suggest any “sub-groups” that may become necessary or helpful to have in place.  
Equipment and Supplies- Ordering the various furniture for the building and making sure that we are meeting the needs of our teachers and supplying the best items for our kids is this groups task.  We can allow for some degree of individualism while maintaining a certain standard at the same time.  This group will have to gather lots of data from the teachers who will be in the 5-6 building, assess furniture that is or may be available from the current middle school and decide what will be done at both buildings.  There will certainly be some room for the movement of technology that is in the existing MS building and there may be a need to purchase some items for the MS to replace other items that will transfer to the 5-6 building and vise versa.  The one campus concept is important to keep in mind, we don’t want to become territorial about equipment but rather decide what is best and most efficient so we can be good stewards of our tax dollars while providing the best possible equipment for our kids.  This task for the most part will need to be concluded by February or early March as we’ll need to have orders placed and equipment delivered in time for the August opening. 
Curriculum- This group will work closely with Darin Kelberlau and members from the Instruction group, however, their task will be a bit different in that we need to examine our content offering to meet the needs of all of our learners.  We’ve put much effort into differentiation at all grade levels and in each of our classrooms there should be interventions that allow for all kids to learn the content. There are times when students could benefit from attending classes in subject matter that is at a higher level of delivery.  Simply said, there are 7th graders  that can complete and do well in 8th grade curriculum  or 5th graders that need the challenge of higher level content;  we have the opportunity to rethink clear grade or age guidelines and start looking more at developmental readiness.  There are many schools where seventh and eighth grade kids are earning high school credit.  Our Board of Ed. Has approved, for instance, the granting of high school credit for Algebra-1 for 8th graders enrolled in “advance math” at the middle school; a class that mirrors Alg. 1 at the high school.  Although we don’t have other curriculum areas approved at this time I can foresee a time when kids leave the 7-8 building with ten or even twenty high school credits.  This may not be something that is in place in 2012-13 or perhaps not even by 2015-16 but I think it is time to begin the discussion and the possible movement toward this end as it would allow for more rigorous content offerings at the high school level and help our kids to start earning college credit in many of their high school classes in the future.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Notes from April 18, 2011

Thanks Kris Woods, for providing notes from our meeting on the 18th. 

Opening
·         2 building campus with possible flexible coverage of administration between buildings and, in future, possible cross-over of students

Trends in Education
·         8th grade algebra will now be a HS credit, would like to see more courses for HS credit in MS
·         Discussed two articles as small groups then sharing with large group concerning communication and real world/creativity for instructional planning along with data driven formative assessments
·         Ken Robinson video about the changing paradigm in education (video references the study in Break Point and Beyond about divergent thinking)

Teaming
·         2012-13 will see approx.  350-360 5th graders at the school, necessitating 4 teams
·         Many questions began at this point:
o        What about 5th graders being developmentally ready for transitions between classes?
o        Team structure: some teachers in group would like to see 4 man teams, some want 2 man teams – teaching to their strengths
o        How many teachers being brought in for 5th grade?  Ideally 16 core teachers with the electives/specials/explores – looking at 5-7 explore class offerings
o        Concern about the writing program now in place at ES, will this continue as a separate class or be integrated in all core classes?  They seem to want a separate class.
o        Can there be a longer block of time for ELA?  Possibly have some subjects every other day
o        What is GREAT time, how is it used?
o        5th grade teachers are generally teaming up for social studies and science instruction already
·         Advantages to a self-contained class or two man teaming
o        Get to know the students, students held more accountable for work (can do math when finished with science because the teacher knows that student needs to extra time, etc.), cross-curricular connections are easy to make and allows for transfer of skills to other classes since teaching all of them, flexible scheduling depending on topics and need for a longer science time and less social studies for example
·         Advantages to full teaming
o        Accountability of student work handled in team planning time, explanation of 90 minute planning for team plan/personal plan time, different eyes on students so see different perspectives of how to handle issues, students see different instructional styles, lessons grow as the day goes on with multiple class input changing the basic lesson by the fourth rendering
·         General layout of the new building

Compass/Decision Making
·         What are your non-negotiables?  Pairs, quads, eights to generate consensus lists of 5 items
·         My group of eight included all the following items that then were cropped:
o        --Grade level common planning time
o        --Dedicated literacy class/classes for writing and reading programs in place in addition to English
o        --Flexibly scheduled media program
o        --Consistent technology plan for adoption of equipment with professional learning
o        --Consistent behavior model in school – PBIS
o        Some sort on unstructured time each day/recess  (Question: is there a playground?)
o        Web presence for each team/class
o        Green environment for paperless classrooms as much as can to save paper/ink but also teach/model sustainable use practices for students
o        All teachers have their own rooms, no teachers on carts
o        Desk vs. tables in rooms, will this be teacher choice?
o        What is the storage in rooms?
o        Keep elective schedule as it now is in 6th grade
·         Group 2 – 5 items
o        Team planning
o        Lit block (60-90 minutes daily) with literacy coach support
o        PBIS
o        A “Home Room” concept to start and end the day with same teacher/group of students for about 10 minutes
o        Brain Break Recess – 15 minute lunch/15 minute recess as finished.  Might allow for quicker lunch turnovers
o        Specialist schedule – all year schedule rather than 12 week blocks with changes
·         Group 3 – 5 items
o        PBIS/Counseling lessons/Whole community (all grade level community building opportunities)/Home room
o        Clubs and Intramurals and/or Recess
o        Teaching technology skills – how will it be done?  Currently in ES, classroom teacher has a “lab” time which they use to teach Word, PPT, etc., before a project in which they will use it.  Will an explore class address this, will the teachers teach the skills
o        Inclusion model?  Co-teaching
o        PE all year

Other Concerns – Post It activity
·         What if team members have different educational views? 
·         Team structures/teacher placement and selection.  Will there be an interview process?  Dr. Sexton said there had not been a plan for interviewing.
·         Subject areas getting equal importance/time/length of day
·         Daily schedule – what will it look like?
·         Start time, traffic flow, transportation
·         Accountability for student emotional welfare – who is responsible
·         How will staff become a cohesive group?  Get to know one another?
·         Opening media collection funding
·         Green school for teaching paperless for our 21st century learners
·         Class sizes
·         Will there be professional development concerning the expected behaviors/developmental stages of 5th and 6th graders for those new to the age group?
·         Models of other schools with intermediate grades schools.  Norfolk opened a 5/6 school this year

Name the Building
·         Consider naming the campus rather than the buildings

Friday, April 1, 2011

Agenda for April 18th 8:00-11:30

This is what I've got so far for an agenda on the morning of the 18th the agenda in the afternoon will be published soon.  Please feel free to add your comments and ideas about items you'd like to add to that morning.  We won't necessarily be able to cover everything, which isn't my intention, but it will get us started on the journey and your ideas will help assure we are discussing the things that matter most to each of you.  Thanks, Gale

Agenda as of 4/1/2011
  • New Trends in Education
  • How does teaming work and what are the advantages and disadvantages of teaming
  • Discuss the idea of departmentalization vs. self-contained classroom structures
  • Develop a "compass" for guiding our decisions throughout the process
  • Talk about and agree upon methods of decision making by the group
  • Is there a name for the new building, if not are there ideas on how to select a name?
  • What else needs to be considered for this date?  (Add  your thoughts by clicking on the (COMMENTs) tab below.
Ken Robinson: Changing education paradigms

A Vision of K-12 Students Today

    Tuesday, March 22, 2011

    Notes from Dr. Gallagher


    HOPE IS NOT A STRATEGY!
    There were many things shared with the group by Dr. Gallagher, here are a few of the things that he talked about along with websites that he recommended.
    They have four "exploratory" classes at Osage, Art, Music both vocal and instrumental, Physical Education and Keyboarding.  In addition, kids spend time during the "rotation" period with their guidance counselor.

    They have four teams/grade level and two of those teams have special education students.  The teams with special needs kids have an extra teacher that helps during co-teaching. 

    At Fort Osage they loop their counselors when possible and their administrators, teachers do not move from one grade to the next. Fire Prairie website:  http://www.fortosage.net/education/school/school.php?sectiondetailid=145&

    He mentioned often, PLAN-DO-STUDY-ACT, as a way of making change happen. http://www.edequity.com/PDFs/Data_Protocol.pdf

    BIST is the support system they use at Osage.  http://www.bist.org/

    They are standards based, something that we may consider as we move into the process.  Our new curriculum director may want some input into this decision.  I will say, I appreciate the report card that tells a parent and student exactly what the child is mastering and what they need to work on to reach mastery.  A "C" only tells them they have a grade between 77 and 85 while a standards based grading system would provide information about the objectives they did and did not meet.  This information is well beyond our first few meetings and may not be something we address until much later in the process...like 2013 for instance.

    Some references he mentioned including books:  (Kris Woods has ordered many of thes books and they will be in the MS professional library soon-Thanks Kris!)

    As we discuss our new school and the many opportunities it will provide for our students and teachers this information will become even more helpful.  I remind you however, we won't be placing their plan and program  on top of what we have but rather will use it as a reference to aide us in the development of a wonderful 5-6 center that will meet the needs of Fremont students and be a result of our work and dedication to doing what is best for kids.